|
The getting and
giving of wisdoms
Kate Ingram is a Melbourne family
therapist who undertook a research project looking at the
effects on therapists and families of gathering stories from
families who had managed to overcome or move away from
problems, and sharing these stories with other families
facing similar troubles. Kate made some interesting and
surprising findings.
I was very interested when invited by The
Bouverie Centre in Melbourne to take part in a research
project examining the effects on people currently in therapy
of reading the narratives of change of people who had
previously been in therapy.
I already knew from my own experience
that such a process can be most inspiring. I was greatly
aided by the stories of others in the anorexia league when I
was co-facilitating a therapeutic group for adolescents
diagnosed with anorexia nervosa. Also, as a member of a
buddhist organisation, I have been inspired by the
testimonies of others who have overcome problems through
Buddhist practice.
The Telling
We called the writings that described the
discoveries and changes that people made in relation to
problems they experienced, their Wisdom narratives.
Accordingly, the research came to be known as the Wisdoms
project. I realised that the therapists at The Bouverie
Centre, like many others, rarely had the time and
opportunity to share their experiences of the successes of
the people with whom they worked. More often than not, peer
supervision in these settings is about solving current
therapeutic difficulties. It seemed to me that this project
could provide us with a unique opportunity to celebrate
these successes and learn from each other.
Seven therapists agreed to take part in
the research known as the Wisdoms project. It seemed logical
to use participatory action research methodology for the
project, which could potentially develop and expand the
knowledge and practice of the therapists. This interested me
because I wanted to obtain 'useful' knowledge that a
therapist might find helpful in clinical work with people.
There were a number of preconceptions
that had to be ironed out before the group could start to
plan the collection of Wisdom narratives. One therapist
asked, 'I am a systemic therapist. To what extent is this a
Narrative approach to my practice?' I wondered if having
invited David Epston to the Centre to introduce ideas about
co-research, and my own leanings towards Narrative therapy,
might have implied that the research would require the
therapists who were gathering the Wisdoms to use a Narrative
therapy model.
It appeared this way as each group member
voiced concern. Most of the group members saw themselves as
systemic family therapists. One said, 'Narrative therapy is
not my style. I am not going to be able to talk to them in
that way,' and 'It raises for me the tension I am having
with narratives, whether they be pure or whether we are
doing a White/Epston co-research.'
For myself, I was simply thinking that
the most important aspect of all of the therapeutic models
was their ability to free people of painful and distressing
problems. My interest in Narrative therapy, and in the
project, was about improving my practice and understanding
to better help the people who come to me, more than entering
into a debate about the relative merits of differing models.
Finally we decided to remain open minded
about ways of approaching the gathering and circulating of
the Wisdoms.
There were also a number of ethical
issues to consider including ensuring confidentiality at all
stages of the process, and ensuring each person was fully
cognisant of all relevant information about the research.
Each participant signed a consent form giving permission for
their Wisdom narratives to be shared with other people. At
any time, a person could change details in their story, or
withdraw permission for it to be shown to others. To
minimise the possibility of identifying individuals by their
voices, all of the recordings were transcribed onto
paper.
The group of seven therapists met for one
hour every three weeks for six months. They followed the
steps of action research, for example, writing or listening
to a person's narrative, acting on and observing the process
and its consequences, reflecting individually, then as a
group on the process and consequences, then replanning,
acting, observing, and reflecting again (Kemmis and
McTaggart, 2000).
THE GETTING OF WISDOMS
Although each therapist gathered each
story from each individual or family in a different way,
there was commonality of intention, for the stories were
written to support or inspire another person or family who
was experiencing something similar to themselves.
Here are some of the findings of the
therapists who were involved in documenting people's Wisdom
narratives:
Writing about an experience with a view
mailto:
to helping others has therapeutic
implications
One therapist found that a person who
wrote ten pages in a 'stream of consciousness' was able to
disclose past abuse that had not been spoken of in two years
of therapy.
Writing about an experience seems to help
people think more clearly about what has happened. The group
speculated on the possibility that reframing an experience
that has previously been fragmented, into a coherent whole,
enables a person to reflect on life as it has been lived.
This somehow frames the experience in a more positive way
for them.
This idea was supported by participants
who reported that even though remembering where they had
been and documenting the changes was painful, they were
nonetheless pleased with the steps they had taken and this
generated a sense of achievement, strength and pride in
themselves.
The writing of a story can generate a
cycle of re-solution
We wondered how we as a group might
generate stories in a way that was not just about producing
documents for an archive, but was also about providing
therapeutic benefit for the writers of the
stories.
I was involved in a situation that
illustrates the therapeutic benefits of using the process of
writing as part of the therapy. I asked a woman if she would
write her story in order to help someone else. Later the
woman told me, 'This was a helpful process because it brings
you back and you have to think about how you were thinking
and feeling at that time and not just now. As you are
writing, it makes you think of what happened and see it as a
past experience - I actually feel better writing about all
of that, because I probably didn't get it half as much off
my chest as what I thought'.
The group observed that this process, for
this woman, was a virtuous cycle that facilitated what it
was designed to achieve.
A story that is 'ghost written' by a
therapist then read back to the person, can engender
feelings of self-compassion
It seemed to the group that in the
process of hearing their stories told with pseudonyms,
people had been able to separate themselves from the hurt,
fear and shame of their past experiences. They looked at
their lives as if they were looking at other people's lives,
and felt the compassion for themselves that they might feel
for others in similar circumstances. People can be
incredibly compassionate towards others who have themselves
experienced hardship and abuse.
THE GIVING OF WISDOMS
The group speculated that sharing
people's Wisdoms in therapy might provide benefits similar
to those received from a self-help group. They found that
when an individual or family heard the experience of another
individual or family, they seemed to connect it with
something in their own lives. Listening to another
individual or family's ideas and perspectives enabled them
to take on a new perspective themselves. This is of course
one of the benefits often gained from self-help groups,
where people with similar problems join together to share,
support and learn from each other.
One woman who found it hard to accept
that her family's problem was big enough for her to go to
therapy and felt guilty for taking up therapy time, changed
her perspective after hearing someone else's narrative.
On another occasion, after having heard
someone else's experience of anorexia, the same woman
starting talking about her own experience of anorexia,
something she had not disclosed previously. Sharing this
experience gave her a chance to reconsider her position in
relation to her daughter who was beginning to engage in an
anorexic lifestyle.
There were other times too, when hearing
a Wisdom narrative stimulated conversations that lead to
more helpful perspectives on more than one occasion.
A therapist cannot predict what a person
will draw from any given story
Time and time again, the group was
surprised at what a person valued or found important in a
story. The group also found that any particular Wisdom
narrative chosen for recounting did not have to correlate
closely with a person's own situation. One therapist who
worked in the area of acquired brain injury, felt that
having an archive to share with her clients from which to
draw stories of hope and discovery, might help her not to be
so consumed by their tragic stories.
Therapists found that using Wisdom
narratives in therapy is not as simple or self-evident as it
seems
For some therapists, the process of
reading the Wisdoms clashed with their preferred style of
working. For example one felt awkward bringing in someone
else's story to the session because this might deflect from
where the client is at.
There was also anxiety about the
different ways in which a person might interpret the
introduction of another's experience into their therapy
session. Therapists wondered if clients might be second
guessing their intention in doing so.
In addition, fears were raised about the
possibility of a story having a negative - even unhelpful -
impact on a person.
The group further wondered how to proceed
in conversation with a person after a story had been read to
them. As one therapist put it, ' I ask a couple of
questions, but then I feel like I am prying into something
that is quite deep as though it is more for my needs than
theirs.'
We decided that the introduction of a
Wisdom narrative into another individual or family's therapy
session needed to be a consultative process. Suggestions for
ways of doing this included:
- introducing a Wisdom narrative in a
similar way to a reflection given by a member of a
reflecting team, in which people are encouraged to choose
from a multiplicity of interpretations or
responses;
- drawing from David Epston's ideas on
'cross-referencing' interviews, in which the therapist and
person explore the Wisdom together, wondering about its
relevancy, emotional and thought-provoking resonances, and
have conversations around this. The aim is to use other
people's stories as interesting references with which to
draw comparisons, inspire or stimulate conversation, or as a
'reference map' for the person's journey.
Conclusion
What then, were the findings of this
group of therapists about the writing and hearing of Wisdom
narratives with their clients?
It appears that writing narratives like
these creates a distance that helps people see themselves in
a different context. The reflexivity that comes with the act
of writing seems to allow people to be able to acknowledge
their strengths and act differently. When a therapist 'ghost
wrote' a story and read it back, people found themselves
able to reflect on their lives without needing to respond,
in contrast with other styles of therapy. It seems that a
reflexive position like this enables a person to have
thoughts and feelings about their thoughts and feelings, and
to be an audience to themselves. This can have an empowering
effect.
It is interesting to reflect on the
consequences for the writers of the stories, of setting
themselves this task to help someone in a similar position.
Not only does this give the writer the therapeutic benefit
of putting words to past trauma, problems or difficult
circumstances, but it also gives them a potential change in
self-perception arising from the realisation that they have
a success story to offer.
The group found that while all the
writers shared the common intention of supporting someone
else, there was a great deal; of variation in each person's
experience of writing. From this arose questions about which
steps to include in order to ensure that the process of
writing is beneficial to the writer. Is it enough to
establish a reflexive position, or is something else
needed?
In relation to the giving of wisdoms to
others in therapy, the group was unsure whether it was the
hearing of stories alone that gave rise to positive effects.
It was suggested that the introduction of Wisdoms is simply
another way for a therapist to stimulate an individual or
family into new and different ways of thinking and
feeling.
It may be that this giving of wisdoms
parallels the experiences of members of self-help groups.
Having someone articulate what you are feeling but have not
found the words to describe, can enable people to reflect on
and to change their feelings, thoughts and actions.
Nonetheless, the giving of wisdoms is
certainly one way of generating dialogue with people - and
for me, dialogue is most instrumental in effective therapy.
With it comes the possibility of emergence of new ways of
relating to self and to problems. The reflective process
invites the type of dialogue that can counteract a
prevailing dominant monologue about life and relationship to
a problem or problems. Like listening in a reflective team,
listening to a Wisdom allows for a 'to and fro' action to
occur between listening and talking, and supports
self-reflection.
Of course it is very important to be
aware of potential 'risks' of introducing Wisdom narratives
in therapy. Therapists need to work with people in a
collaborative and consultative manner, continually exploring
more effective ways of doing this.
As a result of this research project, a
number of Wisdom narratives have been generated at The
Bouverie Centre. A community of ''wisdom tellers' or 'wise
sayers' is being created in a folder that is available for
perusal in the Reception area of the Centre. Time and again,
I have found it very rewarding to see someone at Reception
intently pouring over this folder.
We are using the stories in training
workshops to teach and inspire student therapists. Also we
are generating student Wisdom narratives about the
experience of presenting families of origin in a learning
context.
Some therapists who took part in the
research are continuing to meet as a group to learn more
about the 'getting and giving' of Wisdoms. Some have
acknowledged that hearing families' stories adds new
dimensions to their appreciation of people's courage and
strength. Sadly, this can be lost in routine
sessions.
As for myself, I am sure that a sense of
pride is generated in a person who experiences me believing
that she has important learnings to share with me. This will
benefit my life and work. The Wisdom narrative that is
produced also becomes a testimony to work that has been done
and progress that has been made during our joint endeavour.
I celebrate this mutual creativity together with the people
with whom I work. I believe that a person who has something
to give feels important and is less isolated from the
community of human beings.
REFERENCE
Epston D, White M, Murray K (1992) A
Proposal for re-authoring therapy in S McNamee and K Gergen
(Eds) Therapy as Social Construction. Sage,
London.
A comprehensive report on this research
project is currently being prepared for publication. For
further information, contact Kate Ingram by email at
kany@alphalink.com.au
1 The Bouverie Family Centre is a clinic
and teaching organisation with specialist teams addressing
effects on families of MI, ABI, sexual abuse, same sex
parents, and also dealing with a range of other
presentations
2 Funding provided by the Faculty of
Occupational Health Sciences, Latrobe University,
Melbourne
3 www.narrativeapproaches/anti-anorexia
Our clients are the authors of the
knowledges from whom we learn, not the object of our
observations. We are comrades standing side by side caring
about the same thing.
Epston, 1997
Kate Ingram entered the family therapy
field in the 1990's. She chose the Narrative model for her
work partly because she was so inspired by the revolutionary
idea of locating the problem, not in the person or in family
relationships, but in the problem. She realised that the
process of 'externalising' freed people from the need to
apportion blame, and invited them to learn something
different about themselves and change patterns of behaviour.
The idea of positioning herself not as an
expert knower of a family's life, but as an explorer with
the family of their lived experience, is important to Kate.
Focusing on the ways in which people make sense of their
lives and how this influences their interpersonal
interactions and direction of their lives, rather than
focusing on interactions between family members per se, is
why she does not see herself as systemic therapist.
Kate recognises the potential for
dominant discourses to limit and control people's lives and
influence their perceptions of reality, and believes
re-authoring conversations are powerful intervening tools
for a therapist.
What clinches it for her though is that
Narrative therapy is unique in the field in adopting the
idea of 'audience to change'. Epston, White and Murray
(1992) say, 'If one looks at agency as a resource that is
distributed by others - being granted the right to speak -
then what others think of oneself must be taken into
account; it is not sufficient simply to change one's picture
of oneself privately; one must in addition have a convincing
picture to show others.' For Kate, this idea of inviting
audiences to change through creating an archive, has been
one of the most important aspects of the Wisdoms
project.
Kate Ingram can be contacted by email
kany@alphalink.com.au
The article
first appeared in Narrative Network News December 2002 -
email nnn@swift.net.au.
|